Setting a precedent for other states and safeguarding the interests of renewable energy developers and investors, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has, in a landmark order, upheld the sanctity of power purchase agreements (PPAs) between developers and discoms. In its latest order, dated March 15, 2022, on the issue of PPAs being renegotiated by the Andhra Pradesh government citing poor discom health, the high court stated that the terms of the PPA cannot be altered and that the tariff cannot be renegotiated unilaterally. The order overturns the previous order, dated September 24, 2019, which was passed by a single judge bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, permitting the renewable energy developers to pay an interim tariff that was half the rate agreed to in their contracts for all future and pending bills.
The development comes as a big relief for renewable energy developers and puts an end to a long-drawn legal battle between them and the state discoms. Not only had payments for various projects been pending since the PPA renegotiation proceedings were initiated, but, reportedly, a few projects had also been declared non-performing assets by the lenders.
Key details of the current order
The current order sets aside the earlier order that had fixed an interim rate or interim tariff of Rs 2.44 per unit for solar power and Rs 2.43 per unit for wind power for payment of all pending and future bills of the petitioners. Instead, the discoms have been directed to pay all pending and future bills at the rate mentioned in the PPAs. The payment of arrears/pending bills has to be made within a period of six weeks from the date of the order.
The high court noted that the financial difficulty of the government or the discom is no ground to allow modification of the PPA or to reduce the tariff. The previous order fixing the interim tariff did not appear to be proper and in accordance with the law, it further noted.
With regard to the maintainability of the petitions filed by the state discoms before the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC) seeking tariff reduction and amendment to the applicable tariff regulations retrospectively, the high court noted that the tariff discovered through the competitive bidding process cannot be negotiated/modified. “Determination of tariff at a particular point of time is based on the Wind Power Policy of the government, both central and state, as also other nodal agencies at the relevant point of time and the prevailing market conditions and a host of other factors. If the Tariff Order is subject to review, as and when some parameter or some market condition is changed, then, there will be policy uncertainty, discouraging investors, including global investors, to come forward for the development of renewable energy, which is one of the thrust areas to reduce carbon emissions and global warming,” the high court added in its latest order.
On the curtailment of renewable power, the high court has directed the discoms to not take any coercive steps, such as curtailing production and restricting renewable power evacuation, without prior due notice to the generators. Upholding the decisions passed in the order dated September 24, 2019, the court remarked that renewable energy plants have a must-run status and are, therefore, not subject to merit order despatch.
Summary of the PPA dispute
Back in 2015, the discoms had entered into PPAs for 500 MW of grid-connected solar photovoltaic projects in Andhra Pradesh with bidders selected through the competitive bidding process, in line with Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The tariff adopted by the APERC in accordance with the PPAs was Rs 5.99 per kWh for the first year.
In 2019, the energy department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh constituted a high-level negotiation committee (HLNC) to review, negotiate and bring down the wind and solar power purchase prices on the grounds that the discoms were in a financial crisis with huge power purchase dues. The Andhra Pradesh government, in a review meeting of the energy department, decided to issue recovery notices for losses caused to the discoms and the government on account of the high tariff, to challenge the must-run status of solar power plants and keep thermal plants/other energy sources on standby if there was any disruption in wind/solar power supply during or after negotiations, among other things.
Taking cognisance of the decisions of the Andhra Pradesh government, the central government, the Ministry of Power and the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy issued a letter on July 9, 2019, urging the Government of Andhra Pradesh to act in a fair and transparent manner, and in accordance with the law. The central government reiterated that PPAs are contracts that are binding on all signatories and it is against the law to cancel PPAs. Besides, dishonouring PPAs would inhibit investments in the state. Notwithstanding this, the energy department in the state constituted an HLNC to review and negotiate the high wind and solar power purchase cost under the PPAs. The discoms also issued letters to the petitioners, dated July 12, 2019, seeking a reduction in tariff, failing which the PPAs would be terminated. Notably, however, the payment of energy bills continued to be neglected from May 2018 onwards and was kept pending.
Various solar and wind power developers approached the high court by way of writ petitions challenging the decisions of the state government. A single judge issued an order on September 24, 2019, upholding the prayers of the developers and quashing the instructions issued by the Andhra Pradesh government to renegotiate the tariffs. The judge stated that the terms of the contract/PPA did not permit unilateral alteration or any alteration at the behest of a third party. However, in order to deal with the issue of payment dues and the financial quagmire, the judge directed the discoms to pay the pending and future bills at an interim rate of Rs 2.44 per unit for solar power and Rs 2.43 per unit for wind power till the dispute was resolved by the APERC.
Impact on the sector
Upholding the sanctity of the PPAs, the latest Andhra Pradesh High Court order is a big positive for renewable energy development in the country and investor confidence in the segment. Girishkumar Kadam, senior vice-president and co-group head, corporate ratings, ICRA, explains: “The order issued by the Andhra Pradesh High Court upholding the sanctity of the signed PPAs is a significant, positive development for the renewable energy sector and will provide major liquidity relief for the affected IPPs in the state. The pending resolution of the PPA tariff renegotiation matter has been a key concern for the renewable energy sector and has, in turn, affected the credit profile of wind and solar IPPs in the state, especially entities belonging to relatively weak sponsor groups. However, timely implementation of the high court order by the discoms remains a critical monitorable factor, given the weak financial profile of the discoms in the state, marked by continued losses and a large debt dependence.”
ICRA research estimates that based on the directive of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the incremental impact on the power purchase cost is estimated at about Rs 105 billion due to the build-up of dues arising out of the difference between the PPA rate and the interim rate over the past three years. While the discoms have been directed to make payments of the arrears/pending bills at the rates mentioned in the PPAs within a period of six weeks, timely implementation remains to be seen.
What will be crucial now is the on-ground implementation of the court’s directive in terms of timely payments of dues to developers. Also, in case the order is challenged in the higher court of law, the legal battle on PPA renegotiation could stretch further. These developments will need to be monitored closely.
That said, the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court will give a major fillip to investor confidence in the renewable energy sector as it reinforces the sanctity of PPA contracts. This will not only improve the liquidity position of developers but also deter other states from reneging on PPAs and resorting to payment delays.