The top priorities for the power ministry are to implement the newly launched Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) in letter and spirit, to ingrain payment discipline in the system and to deepen the electricity market through the implementation of market-based economic despatch and the launch of other new products. In an interview with Indian Infrastructure, Alok Kumar, secretary, Ministry of Power (MoP), talks about the current state of the power sector, its recent achievements and the top priorities for the power ministry going forward. Excerpts…
What is your perspective on the current state of the power sector? How do you rate its performance in the past one year?
The power sector has come a long way. Access to electricity is now universal and the availability of power supply has gone up significantly. This has been made possible by accelerated capacity addition and strengthening of our national grid. We have also done very well in our energy transition targets, in terms of the share of non-fossil fuels in our installed power capacity. We have achieved 40 per cent of the non-fossil fuel capacity nine years ahead of the target. As for emissions intensity, the target is to achieve 33 per cent reduction by 2030 (over the 2005 emissions level), and we are already close to 28 per cent reduction.
The first task before us is to improve the quality and reliability of power supply. In the rural areas, we are currently at close to 22 hours of power supply; we have to make it 24 hours. For this, we need a turnaround of our discoms as well as timely investments in the sector. We will also have to continuously augment our generation and transmission capacities. The second big task is to achieve our Nationally Determined Contributions. We have deeper energy efficiency targets of achieving an emissions intensity reduction of 45 per cent and a 50 per cent share of non-fossil fuels in the growing installed capacity by 2030.
One of the flagship achievements in the past one year has been the launch of the RDSS. I am very happy that every state has come forward to commit to reforms under the scheme. There is very wide support from the state governments for reforming the power sector. The biggest achievement is the onboarding of all states for the second-generation reforms envisaged under the RDSS for the turnaround of the discoms.
The notification and implementation of the LPS rules are another flagship intervention by the MoP. This is expected to enforce payment discipline by the state governments. Discoms have fewer problems with respect to operational efficiency but more with regard to delayed payments of subsidies and dues by state governments. The states have understood in a very positive and constructive manner that there is no way out except payment discipline. Once there is payment discipline, everything will be addressed in terms of timely payment of subsidies and government dues. There is a need for better targeting of subsidies. States have limited fiscal space and they do not have infinite capacity for providing subsidies. It will be in the interests of our environment, water resources and energy efficiency to target subsidies in a better manner.
Another big intervention in the power sector is the amendment of the Energy Conservation Act. Firstly, the amendment bill allows the central government to introduce carbon trading schemes in the country. Secondly, it imposes an obligation of non-fossil fuel consumption on designated consumers, in terms of both energy and feedstock. Thirdly, the amendment bill extends the Energy Conservation Building Code to large residential buildings, which could be a game changing initiative for the energy efficiency segment.
Another big initiative pertains to the amendment of the Electricity Act, 2003. This amendment entails softer second-generation reforms for the power sector. These reforms have been formulated after wide consultation with all stakeholders, specifically the state governments, regulators, industry, academia, think tanks and research bodies. One of the biggest industry concerns pertained to cherry-picking by new players in the distribution segment. This has been addressed in a very detailed manner with a foolproof mechanism in the Bill. We have put in place several safeguards against cherry-picking. Firstly, every licensee is covered by the Universal Service Obligation (USO). It would be wrong to say that new licensees will not be covered under the purview of the USO. Secondly, every licensee in the same area will have to include the cross-subsidy surcharge in its tariff, whatever has been settled by the state electricity regulatory commissions. Thirdly, the sharing of the power purchase cost of the incumbent licensee is a big safeguard. Fourthly, the Union Government has a role to play in identifying a minimum area for which a second distribution licensee can be allowed.
There are some myths about the electricity amendment amendment Bill. I would like to clarify that there is not an iota of mention of privatisation, and there will be no change in the ownership of any asset. There is nothing that says that state governments will not be able to give subsidies. The state governments will continue to have the right to give subsidies as they have been giving at present. There is also no provision for direct benefit transfer. Besides this, the discussions regarding minimum tariff must be seen in the proper context. The minimum/maximum tariff is to avoid predatory pricing by new players. The state government can give subsidy of any amount even in a minimum tariff scenario.
Are you seeing signs that the implementation of the RDSS will be better than the previous schemes?
Yes. In the earlier schemes, the investment was in the expansion of the system. The Deendayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) aimed at village electrification while Saubhagya focused on household electrification. Under the RDSS, in the first part, we are sanctioning only works related to loss reduction, and network augmentation will be done in the second part only. Under loss reduction works, one of the key focus areas is smart metering infrastructure.
Under earlier schemes, it was seen that capital investments were made towards assets that were not put to use. Under the RDSS, we are adopting the TOTEX mode, which will ensure that these assets are put to use. Under the Accelerated Power Development and Reforms Programme and the Integrated Power Development Scheme, the focus was more on network expansion with the addition of new substations and feeders. While network expansion is a part of the RDSS to some extent, the major focus is on loss reduction. Apart from this, under the earlier schemes, the grant flow was not linked to the actions taken by the discoms on the promises made by them. This has completely changed now. Although it will be slightly painful, under the RDSS the flow of grant will stop if the discoms do not implement the Action Plan or do not continue to meet the pre-qualification criteria.
Renewable energy integration has been increasing steadily, despite initial concerns. Are you satisfied with how things have panned out in the renewable energy segment?
The investments in the renewable energy space are a way of preparing for the future. So far, the share of renewable energy in generation has been around 24-25 per cent, including large hydro. However, if you exclude large hydro, the contribution of renewable energy stands at 10-11 per cent. The share of renewable generation in the grid is going to increase very rapidly. Hence, the challenge of integrating renewables will be far greater in the future. Till now, flexing coal-based thermal power plants was not a huge problem given the limited contribution of renewable energy. But with its share increasing, it may well prove to be a problem without energy storage. India has a huge national grid; hence we need to empower the National Load Despatch Centre and the State Load Despatch Centres. In my opinion, these are some of the things that need to be implemented, otherwise achieving 500 GW of non-fossil fuel installed capacity will be problematic. In the coming years, intermittent renewable power sources such as solar and wind will grow rapidly. As of now, solar and wind power have a combined installed capacity of around 90 GW in India. When both grow rapidly by over 300 GW in the coming years, integration of variable renewable energy capacity will be a far greater challenge given that baseload power will not grow to a similar extent.
What are your expectations from the hydropower segment going forward?
The hydro segment is going to be on an upward trajectory, with more hydroelectric plants (HEPs) being installed. In the past two years, the Central Government has sanctioned many projects, especially in Jammu & Kashmir. The government has approved the construction of Sawalakote HEP, Ratle HEP, Kiru HEP and Kawar HEP. Moreover, the Central Government is in discussion with the Arunachal Pradesh government for the development of about 10,000 MW of potential HEP capacity through allocations to CPSUs.
Pumped storage will be a success story as the MoP is looking at incentivising investment in them and developing them. Pumped storage hydro (PSH) capacity will especially rise in states such as Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, as these states have come up with a quick way of deploying this technology. The Central Government has, via the Ministry of Finance, given in-principle approval for viability gap funding (VGF) equal to 20 per cent to PSH plants. Moreover, many PSH plants will be commissioned regardless of VGF because they are very viable and useful in light of the transformation of power markets. In my opinion, the growth rate of PSH plants will be much higher than the growth rate of conventional hydropower plants.
What are your expectations from nuclear power going forward?
We had a number of discussions with the Department of Atomic Energy. It is working on augmenting India’s nuclear capacity to 15,000 MW by 2030 from about 7,000 MW at present. Another favourable development is that NTPC Limited and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) have agreed to revive their joint venture and have identified two nuclear projects for development. I am sure it will pave the way for more investments in nuclear energy, as seen in the case of renewable energy where CPSEs paved the way for attracting investments from private players. Nuclear power will play a big role in ensuring a successful transition to net zero emissions by 2070; hence the joint venture between NTPC and NPCIL is a very significant development.
What are the biggest challenges and issues for the sector?
The biggest challenge for the power sector is restoration of the financial viability of the discoms. Secondly, the functioning of the power system at the state level has to be modernised and opened up in terms of open access and consumer engagement, and become more forward looking. Modernisation of the power systems involves increasing the penetration of smart grid technologies so that discoms can provide world-class supply and reliable power to consumers with an increasing share of renewable energy. Thirdly, the discoms have to reinvent themselves and become commercial organisations. Till now, they have focused on expanding electricity supply to smaller towns and rural areas. Going forward, discoms have to restructure themselves to be commercially oriented. The technical functions will continue to be important; however, commercial considerations will become equally or more important. Fourthly, tariff reforms and subsidy targeting will play a very vital role in the coming years as they are the key to ensuring the competitiveness of the industrial sector and raising energy efficiency to a high level.
What are your top priorities in the medium term? What is your outlook going forward?
The medium-term top priority is to take the RDSS forward and ensure that it is implemented in the same letter and spirit as the one with which we have designed it. Next is to ensure that payment discipline becomes embedded and ingrained in the system. My next priority will be to transform the electricity markets in India with the implementation of market-based economic despatch and arrangements like Contract for Difference. Many discoms have a lot of fixed costs, which adversely impact their cost structure. To address this, we have to transform the electricity markets so as to channelise all surplus capacity throughout the year.
